More servicesWindows Live
HomeHotmailSpacesOneCare
 
MSN
Sign in
 
 
Spaces home  Mike's RantsProfileFriendsFilesMore Tools Explore the Spaces community

Mike's Rants

Supporting Rational Thought Since 1956
View space
Akhenaten
View space
Chiwa
View space
Eileen
View space
Michael S. Neuren, Esq.
View space
Ruth Galos
View space
Brandy
View space
Community Manager
View space
John @ Work

June 28

Bill Gates: Looking Back, Moving Ahead

 

From all of us who have had the privilege of helping you change the world…

Thank you, BillG

Bill Gates: Looking Back, Moving Ahead

June 08

Now that it is One on One

Now that we have presumptive candidates from both major political parties it’s time to compare their positions on the issues without the daily distraction of pundits and speeches.

I've taken these position statements from MSNBC' great Candidate and Issue Matrix where they documented the positions on these five issues for all the candidates that have run in this amazingly long campaign.

  John McCain Barack Obama
Economy McCain has called for the line-item veto and promised to veto any bills laden with pork-barrel appropriations. He is a leading Republican supporter of the North American Free Trade Agreement and favors permanent trade relations with China. Obama proposes spending $250 million a year on public-private business "incubators" to help entrepreneurs create start-up companies. He supports raising the minimum wage and indexing it to inflation, and promises to spend $1 billion on career pathways programs for low-income workers.
Energy McCain supports reinvesting oil profits in nuclear and alternative energy sources. He says continued high gasoline prices justify investment in ethanol, a position he previously opposed. He has voted to ban drilling in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge. Obama proposes a "cap-and-trade" system to cut carbon emissions and raise money for new energy programs. He calls for an annual 4 percent rise in fuel standards and increased research into nuclear power. He says 20 percent of U.S. energy needs should be met by renewable resources by 2020.
Health care McCain has not made health care a major issue in his campaign. He opposes mandated universal health coverage and instead favors incremental steps like expanding community health centers and the State Children’s Health Insurance Program, creating tax incentives for low-income Americans and promoting health savings accounts. Obama promises to reform the private insurance market to promote competition in pricing and quality. He proposes a national health plan to cover people without private or workplace access to insurance and would require that all children have health insurance.
Immigration McCain supported President Bush’s immigration reform program. He backs a temporary worker program and voted to allow illegal immigrants to participate in Social Security. He promises to secure the borders but says the issue should not overshadow the U.S. alliance with Mexico. Obama says he would secure U.S. borders by deploying more border agents and more advanced technology, requiring employers to verify worker' immigration status, lowering immigration fees to encourage legal entry and providing a path to citizenship for illegal immigrants.
Iraq war McCain supports President Bush’s troop “surge” and says setting a date for a troop withdrawal would be “setting a date for surrender.” He calls for committing more troops to Iraq to counter the insurgency and stabilize the country. Obama, who spoke against the war as early as 2002, calls for a phased-in redeployment of U.S. troops to other parts of the Middle East outside Iraq to conduct counterterrorism operations

May 31

Consistently Worth Reading

From David Brin's exceptionally good blog, Contrary Brin

If liberalism does fiercely take up a can do, pro-technology, problem-solving ethos, it will complete the trouncing of troglodytic neoconservatism and truly win America’s Civil War Part III.

Not a whole lot to add to that and not a lot needed...

April 24

Live Mesh Provides a Secondary Opportunity

Windows Live Tags: Live, Mesh, Clubhouse, Pundits, Story

While Microsoft's new Live Mesh system including its MOE (Mesh Operating Environment) infrastructure is of literally mind-boggling importance, the real opportunity that people get from it right now is the chance to see which analysts and analysis firms actually have a clue about technology and which ones just parrot the same items over and over and over.

While a good percentage of top tier analysts (Thurrott, Scoble, Gillmor and others) get the significance of the underlying architecture, there are quite a few major analysts and firms who didn't even bother to look at Live Mesh as more than a system for synchronizing files between computers. That's the equivalent of seeing Windows 1.0 and doing a review of the bundled Microsoft Write applet.

Another group of the clueless insist on comparing Live Mesh with whatever their particular definition of "Web 2.0" happens to be. Of course, Live Mesh doesn't match their definitions. While "Web 2.0" is the equivalent of replacing the dumb terminals of "Web 1.0" with smart terminals, Live Mesh is the equivalent of replacing dumb terminals with a peer to peer network of personal computers. That they don't get this means they're as tied in to the "web as terminal" model as their predecessors were at thinking of the PC as an IBM 327x terminal that could do some local preprocessing.

Really, what coverage of Live Mesh offers today is this:

  • If an analyst understands that Live Mesh is a rethinking of how computing can be done in an always-on global network, keep reading them.
  • If they think of Live Mesh as just a sync platform for files then they don't bother doing homework and, if you keep reading them, realize that their analysis may be based on a quick glance rather than in-depth study.
  • If they talk about how awful it is that Live Mesh isn't whatever they consider "Web 2.0" then flip the bozo bit on them and, if you bother reading them again, realize that they're looking at the world through a strong filter that can't see change except as minor variations on the world they already know.

So, even for those people who don't get immediately get into the limited tech preview, Live Mesh offers up something of immediate value. A good litmus test of what analysts to trust. And that's worth a lot right there.

---

May 2nd Update: It seems that Scoble, after posting vocally about how cool the Live Mesh platform is has suddenly decided that it won't work because his latest version of "the cool kids" all use Macs and think Microsoft is bad. I guess he got a lecture from his friends that if he said nice things about Microsoft they wouldn't let him sit with them at lunch so, with no explanation, he's now saying Joel on Software gets something. Sad to see how the echo chamber of Silicon Valley works but it's clearly in action again.

Oh, and in case you need this month's program, the "cool kids" in the Scoble/Valley universe are now called "Early Adopters" and that's defined as people who live on Twitter, use Macs and carry iPhones. Of course, last month it was self proclaimed "A Listers" that were the social circle that told Scoble what to think. I guess declaring yourself an "A Lister" was too egocentric even for the valley.

April 22

And once again the world changes

Tonight, April 22nd, 2008 at 9:00 PM Pacific Daylight Time the world changed.

Although few realize quite what happened yet, the shape of the Internet was altered by the announcement of the very early preview of Microsoft's Live Mesh and with it a synchronization and distribution platform with the potential to change how we think of the Internet and with it communication and cooperation.

I won't add much but, for the moment, there's an interview with Ray Ozzie and a hands-on demo of the basic technology for those who like video and good introductory content at the Live Mesh team blog that can get you started.

View more entries
 

Public folders

Folders shared with the world